{ Banner }

Intellectual Property & Technology Blog

  • Posts by Marcus Burnside
    Senior Counsel

    Marcus Burnside advises technology companies, private equity-backed businesses, and foreign clients on intellectual property strategy, AI governance, and data privacy. His practice sits at the intersection of three areas most ...

Anthropic's move is a compliance response to the EU AI Act, not a breakthrough in AI detection, and it leaves three questions unanswered.

On August 2, 2026, the day Article 50(2) of the EU AI Act took effect, Anthropic announced that it will begin embedding invisible watermarks in text generated by new Claude models and will work toward implementing this feature in models released before August 2, 2026. The mark lives in the statistics of the writing itself, the small, repeated word choices a model makes across a response, not a visible tag or footer. It survives copy and paste, may survive ...

On July 21, 2026, OpenAI disclosed what actually happened in the Hugging Face intrusion reported the week before. It was not an external threat actor. Two of OpenAI's own AI models, its newly released GPT 5.6 Sol and an unreleased, more capable model, broke out of a controlled internal test, reached the open internet, and used stolen login credentials along with a previously unknown security flaw to access Hugging Face's servers.

The detail worth sitting with is what the test was for. OpenAI was not testing whether its models could breach a third party. It was evaluating general cyber ...

AI already cost your company one form of protection over employee work product. Weak governance can cost you the second.

In January 2026, a federal court in the Northern District of California threw out a trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI. The plaintiff, Rebecca Trinidad, claimed she had developed proprietary frameworks for “emergent identity” and “autonomous multi-agent collaboration,” and that OpenAI had misappropriated them. The court didn’t need to decide whether her ideas had value. It dismissed her Defend Trade Secrets Act claim with prejudice for a simpler ...

How a 1967 Telephone Statute Became a $5,000-a-Click Litigation Machine, and Why Sacramento’s Fix Only Solves Part of the Problem

On January 27 and 28, 2025, two California Superior Court judges ruled on the same legal theory a day apart and reached opposite conclusions. In Sanchez v. Cars.com, Inc. and Aviles v. LiveRamp, Inc., both courts held that California’s pen register and trap-and-trace statute, written for telephone lines, does not reach a website’s collection of a visitor’s IP address and device identifiers. Other courts, on nearly identical facts, have let the ...

Categories: Data Privacy

On June 12, 2026, the Trump Administration issued an export control directive under national security authorities requiring Anthropic to immediately suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all foreign nationals, anywhere in the world, including Anthropic's own foreign-national employees. Anthropic received verbal notice. There was no written order, no opportunity to remediate, and no formal findings to contest. To comply, the company pulled both models for everyone.

That is the fastest regulatory action I have seen taken against a technology company in recent memory.

The ...

One week produced more AI regulatory activity at the federal level than Congress managed in years of privacy debates: an executive order on AI cybersecurity, a national security memorandum directing the military to adopt commercial AI at scale, and a bipartisan congressional draft proposing the first comprehensive federal AI framework. The pattern matters more than any single item.

The Federal Government Is Moving First

Privacy law in the United States followed a familiar arc. Europe acted, Congress debated, and eventually twenty-plus states passed their own laws. California ...

On May 5, five of the world's largest publishing houses, Hachette, Macmillan, McGraw Hill, Elsevier, and Cengage, joined author Scott Turow in filing a class action against Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges Meta torrented over 267 terabytes of pirated material, the equivalent of hundreds of millions of publications, to train its Llama large language models, and that Zuckerberg personally authorized abandoning licensing negotiations in favor of using pirated datasets. This is a case worth watching carefully, for reasons ...

On May 11, 2026, the Office of the Texas Attorney General (AG) filed a 59-page petition in Collin County District Court against Netflix, Inc., alleging that the company spent years assuring consumers it was an ad-free, privacy-respecting alternative to Big Tech while quietly constructing one of the most sophisticated behavioral surveillance systems in the world. Netflix’s CEO told investors in 2019 they could “be confident” the company would never move into advertising. By 2022, Netflix had launched an ad-supported tier powered by the very data it swore it wasn’t ...

Categories: Data Privacy

Most business leaders hear "governance" and think paperwork. They picture privacy policies, data retention schedules, and the compliance team quietly doing its thing in the background. AI governance is something fundamentally different, and mistaking one for the other could leave your company significantly behind.

Unlike data governance or privacy compliance, which largely include how to conform business practices to fit risk frameworks, AI governance is about defining how your business will integrate and use AI in the first place. It is a strategic framework more akin to a ...

On June 4, 2024, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton launched a Data Privacy and Security Initiative to address growing concerns over personal data misuse. The initiative aims to enforce compliance with Texas privacy laws, targeting practices like the illegal exploitation of sensitive data, including biometric and AI-collected information.